Ingenuism Weekly 10
> what we pay for things, not the value of things
But value is the product of the mind, ie, what we choose to buy. You suggest intrinsic value.
You could read it that way, but "value of things" in this context leaves open what determines the value of things.
Why leave it open, rather than defining it, especially given objective value?
> what we pay for things, not the value of things
But value is the product of the mind, ie, what we choose to buy. You suggest intrinsic value.
You could read it that way, but "value of things" in this context leaves open what determines the value of things.
Why leave it open, rather than defining it, especially given objective value?